Reviewer #1: This manuscript does not meet the standards of importance, novelty and broad interest required by ****. The underlying physics phenomena are not very original, and the manuscript does not put forward new items of interest for an audience of physicists. There is overlap with the existing literature, and not enough original contribution to the subject to make this manuscript a stand-alone, outstanding paper.
The context, state-of-the-art and motivation are not sufficiently detailed, and the approach seems to be quite technical and very specific for a given case, without a wider or more generalized exploration. In summary, I cannot recommend this manuscript for publication.