论文君|NEJM.net

  • 首页
  • 论文句库
  • 交流中心
  • 我要提问
不出版就出局
Publish or Perish
  1. 首页
  2. 方法
  3. 正文

This indicated there was no requirement for proceeding to a full formal ethics and data protection review by the Usher Research Ethics Group.

2022年7月13日 2525点热度 0人点赞 0条评论

Ethics committee approval
The study was sponsored by the University of Edinburgh (reference AC20095). Prior to commencement, the research was subject to the Usher Institute (University of Edinburgh) ethics and data protection oversight process. The ethics and data protection triage and overview self-audit of ethics and data protection issues (completed by EG) confirmed that the proposed research, being secondary analysis of a fully anonymized publicly accessible dataset, posed no foreseeable ethics or data protection risks. This indicated there was no requirement for proceeding to a full formal ethics and data protection review by the Usher Research Ethics Group.

Citation: Gillette E, Boardman JP, Calvert C, John J, Stock SJ (2022) Associations between low Apgar scores and mortality by race in the United States: A cohort study of 6,809,653 infants. PLoS Med 19(7): e1004040. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1004040

标签: 伦理
最后更新:2022年7月13日

admin

Research is not to publish, but to find the truth.

点赞
< 上一篇
下一篇 >

文章评论

您需要 登录 之后才可以评论
最新问题
  • sci论文小修编辑没给审稿意见 提问人 admin
  • 为什么编辑部说有些审稿人审完了,但仍未收到comments呢? 提问人 admin
  • sci论文添加作者 提问人 admin
  • 一篇参考文献是特刊上发表的SCI论文,页码怎样标注? 提问人 admin
  • 论文申诉:三个审稿人,两个建议补充,一个建议拒稿 提问人 admin
  • 论文已经available online,后续Track工作的问题 提问人 admin
  • 论文返修中调整作者排序要怎么做呢? 提问人 admin
  • 投中elsevier的期刊一分钱都没付 提问人 admin
  • 投稿遇见很难受的事儿:审稿人死扣不放 提问人 admin
  • 何抵制白嫖的一点体会 提问人 admin
最新 热点 随机
最新 热点 随机
The study used existing publicly available and deidentified data The Stanford institutional review board deemed this study exempt as it uses deidentified, administratively collected data. The HPS contains the Patient Health Questionnaire-4 (PHQ-4), a well-established and validated screening tool for anxiety and depression. HPS public-use files were used to construct the analytic sample. School of Public Health Institutional Review Board deemed this study exempt. Several study limitations should be acknowledged. Ethical approval was not sought as the data were already publicly available online. We checked the robustness of our findings The aim of this study was twofold. This systematic review and meta-analysis includes previously published observational studies. This indicated there was no requirement for proceeding to a full formal ethics and data protection review by the Usher Research Ethics Group. No overall prospective analysis plan was used. Complete case analyses were used. Study approval was received from Institutional Review Boards (IRBs) of the primary research institution These findings must be interpreted in light of several limitations
As the current study used retrospective publicly available data, we did not require ethics approval. School of Public Health Institutional Review Board deemed this study exempt. HPS public-use files were used to construct the analytic sample. The study used existing publicly available and deidentified data We checked the robustness of our findings We excluded those with missing data for the primary exposure Analysis began August 2020 and ended May 2021. Study approval was received from Institutional Review Boards (IRBs) of the primary research institution The aim of this study was twofold. The HPS contains the Patient Health Questionnaire-4 (PHQ-4), a well-established and validated screening tool for anxiety and depression. We are aware of only a few previous studies on this topic The study was not considered human research This study is not without limitations. Student consent was assumed with the completion of the questionnaire. This study is subject to certain limitations.

COPYRIGHT © 2021 nejm.net. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

Theme Kratos Made By Seaton Jiang