The study used existing publicly available and deidentified data; therefore, it did not qualify as human subjects research and did not require institutional review board review. 出处:doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2022.0056
The study used existing publicly available and deidentified data; therefore, it did not qualify as human subjects research and did not require institutional review board review. 出处:doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2022.0056
The Stanford institutional review board deemed this study exempt as it uses deidentified, administratively collected data. 出处:Ligibel JA, Goularte N, Berliner JI, et al. Well-Being Parameters and Intention to Leave Current Institution Among Academic Physicians…
Outcome The HPS contains the Patient Health Questionnaire-4 (PHQ-4), a well-established and validated screening tool for anxiety and depression.8,13 The screener asks respondents to report the frequency during which they felt down, worried, generally uninteres…
Study Design and Data Source Thirteen waves of data from the US Census Bureau’s Household Pulse Survey (HPS) public-use files, spanning December 29, 2021, to January 19, 2023,were used to construct the analytic sample. JAMA. 2024;331(4):294-301. doi:10.1001/ja…
Ethics Statement The Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health Institutional Review Board deemed this study exempt. Informed consent was not required because the data were deidentified. JAMA. 2024;331(4):294-301. doi:10.1001/jama.2023.25599
Ethical approval was not sought as the data were already publicly available online. No subjects were further involved, and no patient identifiable data were obtained. There was also no funding source for this project. Cite this article as: Cattermole GN, Graha…
This systematic review and meta-analysis includes previously published observational studies. We could not influence the design of the prior studies upon which this work is based and cannot comment on individual ethics approval or consent. Patients were not in…
Ethics committee approval The study was sponsored by the University of Edinburgh (reference AC20095). Prior to commencement, the research was subject to the Usher Institute (University of Edinburgh) ethics and data protection oversight process. The ethics and …
Statistical methods The data were analyzed using R version 4.0.2. No overall prospective analysis plan was used. Demographic characteristics were derived for the cohort and each Apgar score group (low, intermediate, normal), with frequencies and percentages re…
We used R version 3.6.1 (https://www.rstudio.org) to analyse the data, and 2-tailed p-values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. Complete case analyses were used. Citation: Ismail S, Odland ML, Malik A, Weldegiorgis M, Newbigging K, Ped…