投Energy，结果一周多收到编辑的拒稿信，但是原文如下，需要再投嘛？

都说energy期刊周期长，在被其他一区期刊拒了之后，投了Energy。
昨天收到编辑的回信，

Comments:
Although your manuscript falls within the aim and scope of this journal, it is being declined due to lack of sufficient novelty. We receive a much larger number of papers than we are able to accept.

编辑的信：

Your manuscript titled ************* has been screened for possible publication in Energy. In its current state, your manuscript cannot be submitted to a member of the Editorial Board for the scientific review process.

If you wish to submit a revised version of your manuscript, please address the comments below and submit your revised paper as a new submission. Once you have addressed the comments below your paper can enter the review process.

We recommend you consult our journal instructions at http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find ... authorinstructions.

这种情况，我们是修改之后重新投，还是直接改投的好？

创新性不足，感觉是宣判死刑了。但是国际上就一篇文献，我们虽然各方面和这个有点类似，但是文章主体部分，还有1-2点的不同啊。