JBE初审被拒，请大家帮忙看下审稿人的意见

第一个审稿人：

While this is a well-written paper, there are some fundamental concerns that I categorise under two major titles: theoretical and methodological.

第二个审稿人:

This paper is interesting. However, below I have some specific comments that might help improve the paper.

第三个审稿人:

The topic and the overall framework are interesting. The paper is well-organized and fairly easy to navigate. However, there are several issues that have severely undermined its contributions to the literature.

虽然拒稿是个很常见的事情，对于科研人来说但是还是有点伤心加失落啊。仔细研究了审稿人的意见，每个审稿人都提了六七个问题，但是总体评价似乎还算积极的吧？由于是第一次SCI，对于审稿人评语不是很明白，比如“well-written”“interesting”对一篇文章是哪种程度的评价？是礼貌用语吗？