Nature communications 的编辑拒信
以下为编辑的拒信中关于我们文章的评论,请大家看看是否有必要按意见修改后argue,还是直接转投他刊。非常感谢
In this case, while we appreciate your demonstration of ******** and we do not question the validity of your work, I am afraid without a stronger discussion of the advantages over existing literature or more strongly motivated by application we are not persuaded that your findings represent a sufficiently striking advance to justify publication in Nature Communications.
5 回复