论文君|NEJM.net

  • 首页
  • 论文句库
  • 交流中心
  • 我要提问
方法
方法

Study approval was received from Institutional Review Boards (IRBs) of the primary research institution

Study approval was received from Institutional Review Boards (IRBs) of the primary research institution in each participating country as well as the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health IRB. Detailed country-specific study procedures for the GEAS ha…

2022年6月16日 0条评论 5622点热度 0人点赞 admin 阅读全文
方法

We excluded those with missing data for the primary exposure

We excluded those with missing data for the primary exposure (ethnicity) and outcome of interest (SARS-CoV-2 infection) from all analyses. Multiple imputation by chained equations was used to impute missing data in these logistic regression models. The imputat…

2022年6月14日 0条评论 1977点热度 0人点赞 admin 阅读全文
方法

The data analysis had been planned in advance of the data gathering

The data analysis had been planned in advance of the data gathering for the mortality follow-up except the data analysis of subgroups presented in Table 4. It was evolved from the review process of this paper. John U, Rumpf H-J, Hanke M, Meyer C (2021) Alcohol…

2022年6月13日 0条评论 1724点热度 0人点赞 admin 阅读全文
方法

Data for the NHIS analyses were weighted using the final person weights

Data for the NHIS analyses were weighted using the final person weights with linearized variance estimates based on the predefined stratum and primary sampling units. Association of Skin Cancer and Indoor Tanning in Sexual Minority Men and Women JAMA Dermatol.…

2022年5月2日 0条评论 1982点热度 0人点赞 admin 阅读全文
方法

SUDAAN software, version 10.1 (RTI International), which accounts for weighted data and the complex sample design

SUDAAN software, version 10.1 (RTI International), which accounts for weighted data and the complex sample design of the survey, was used for all data analysis. Prevalence of Indoor Tanning and Association With Sunburn Among Youth in the United States JAMA Der…

2022年4月24日 0条评论 1573点热度 0人点赞 admin 阅读全文
方法

Student consent was assumed with the completion of the questionnaire.

The YRBS protocol was approved by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention institutional review board. Participation in the survey was anonymous and voluntary, and local parental permission procedures were used. Student consent was assumed with the compl…

2022年4月24日 0条评论 1174点热度 0人点赞 admin 阅读全文
方法

The IRB at the University of Massachusetts Medical School reviewed the protocol and exempted it from the full committee review

The IRB at the University of Massachusetts Medical School reviewed the protocol and exempted it from the full committee review because the publicly available data contained no personal identifiable information on survey participants. 出处:Soni A, Fahey N, Bhutta…

2022年2月22日 0条评论 1828点热度 0人点赞 admin 阅读全文
方法

The baseline data collection for this study did not require ethical approval.

The study did not have a protocol. The baseline data collection for this study did not require ethical approval. For the follow-up mortality data collection, we received a statement from the ethics committee of the University Medicine Greifswald stating that i…

2021年11月13日 0条评论 2508点热度 1人点赞 iRobot 阅读全文
方法

This study was exempt from institutional review board approval

This study was exempt from institutional review board approval because the data used in this secondary analysis are de-identified and publicly available. Lian Q, Yu C, Tu X, Deng M, Wang T, Su Q, et al. (2021) Grade repetition and bullying victimization in ado…

2021年11月13日 0条评论 5385点热度 0人点赞 iRobot 阅读全文
方法

No further ethical approval was deemed necessary.

This study only used pre-existing anonymous survey data, and no further ethical approval was deemed necessary. Ismail S, Odland ML, Malik A, Weldegiorgis M, Newbigging K, Peden M, et al. (2021) The relationship between psychosocial circumstances and injuries i…

2021年11月13日 0条评论 1626点热度 0人点赞 iRobot 阅读全文
123
最新问题
  • sci论文小修编辑没给审稿意见 提问人 admin
  • 为什么编辑部说有些审稿人审完了,但仍未收到comments呢? 提问人 admin
  • sci论文添加作者 提问人 admin
  • 一篇参考文献是特刊上发表的SCI论文,页码怎样标注? 提问人 admin
  • 论文申诉:三个审稿人,两个建议补充,一个建议拒稿 提问人 admin
  • 论文已经available online,后续Track工作的问题 提问人 admin
  • 论文返修中调整作者排序要怎么做呢? 提问人 admin
  • 投中elsevier的期刊一分钱都没付 提问人 admin
热门问题
  • Nature 投稿,送审后,一般多久给审稿意见? 提问人 iRobot
  • Awaiting AE Recommendation 要多久? 提问人 iRobot
  • 两个审稿人都给了Major Revision,然后编辑拒稿 提问人 iRobot
  • 投了一篇Chemical Engineering Journal,现在好忐忑 提问人 iRobot
  • 太坑了:论文第一作者被老师抢了,通讯作者被师兄抢了,还不给发开源 提问人 iRobot
  • 投稿 被审稿人通过又被编辑拒收,投诉有用吗? 提问人 iRobot
  • 被编辑黑了,如何申诉? 提问人 iRobot
  • 顶刊和三流期刊,编辑的差距,真不是一般的大 提问人 iRobot

COPYRIGHT © 2021 nejm.net. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

Theme Kratos Made By Seaton Jiang