论文君|NEJM.net

  • 首页
  • 论文句库
  • 交流中心
  • 我要提问
不出版就出局
Publish or Perish
  1. 首页
  2. 方法
  3. 正文

Study approval was received from Institutional Review Boards (IRBs) of the primary research institution

2022年6月16日 286点热度 0人点赞 0条评论

Study approval was received from Institutional Review Boards (IRBs) of the primary research institution in each participating country as well as the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health IRB. Detailed country-specific study procedures for the GEAS have been described previously [20].

Shoshanna L. Fine, Rashelle J. Musci, Judith K. Bass, Effie Chipeta, Eric M. Mafuta, Anggriyani W. Pinandari, Siswanto A. Wilopo, Xiayun Zuo, Robert W. Blum,
A Multi-Country Study of Risk and Protective Factors for Emotional and Behavioral Problems Among Early Adolescents, Journal of Adolescent Health,2022,ISSN 1054-139X, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2022.05.002.

 

标签: 伦理
最后更新:2022年6月16日

admin

Research is not to publish, but to find the truth.

点赞
< 上一篇

文章评论

您需要 登录 之后才可以评论
最新问题
  • response letter提交后发现一个修改的地方段落号标错 提问人 admin
  • 明确引用别人论文的方法,这部分公式都是别人论文的算抄袭吗 提问人 admin
  • chemical engineering journal 被预警了,还能投吗? 提问人 admin
  • 审稿人抄袭稿件原图发表 提问人 admin
  • 英文期刊的卷首文有意义吗? 提问人 admin
  • 有从不找英文润色的吗? 提问人 admin
  • mdpi的Energies期刊咋样,费用1.5w的SCI 提问人 admin
  • 编辑提出了这样一个问题,Error estimates should be included throughout 提问人 admin
  • 审稿人曲解作者意图,非让考虑他认为的那种情况 提问人 admin
  • Elsevier的杂志文章排版后,每幅图标题都被加上一句话 提问人 admin
最新 热点 随机
最新 热点 随机
Study approval was received from Institutional Review Boards (IRBs) of the primary research institution These findings must be interpreted in light of several limitations We excluded those with missing data for the primary exposure The data analysis had been planned in advance of the data gathering Data for the NHIS analyses were weighted using the final person weights Consistent with those of other studies, our findings show that This study is subject to certain limitations. Reductions in indoor tanning could be attributed to several factors. SUDAAN software, version 10.1 (RTI International), which accounts for weighted data and the complex sample design Student consent was assumed with the completion of the questionnaire. The IRB at the University of Massachusetts Medical School reviewed the protocol and exempted it from the full committee review The baseline data collection for this study did not require ethical approval. This study was exempt from institutional review board approval No further ethical approval was deemed necessary. Addressing school violence and bullying is essential in order to achieve the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
The data analysis had been planned in advance of the data gatheringWe excluded those with missing data for the primary exposureThese findings must be interpreted in light of several limitationsStudy approval was received from Institutional Review Boards (IRBs) of the primary research institution
Our study has some limitations. Student consent was assumed with the completion of the questionnaire. This study is not without limitations. These new findings should be examined alongside several study limitations. Data for the NHIS analyses were weighted using the final person weights All GSHS surveys were approved in each country by both a national government administrative body and an institutional review board or ethics committee We also performed 2 sensitivity analyses. Analysis began August 2020 and ended May 2021. This study is subject to certain limitations. As the current study used retrospective publicly available data, we did not require ethics approval. The baseline data collection for this study did not require ethical approval. Reductions in indoor tanning could be attributed to several factors. approval from an Institutional Review Board was not necessary The IRB at the University of Massachusetts Medical School reviewed the protocol and exempted it from the full committee review This study was exempt from institutional review board approval

COPYRIGHT © 2021 nejm.net. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

Theme Kratos Made By Seaton Jiang