论文君|NEJM.net

  • 首页
  • 论文句库
  • 交流中心
  • 我要提问
不出版就出局
Publish or Perish
  1. 首页
  2. 方法
  3. 正文

Study approval was received from Institutional Review Boards (IRBs) of the primary research institution

2022年6月16日 3712点热度 0人点赞 0条评论

Study approval was received from Institutional Review Boards (IRBs) of the primary research institution in each participating country as well as the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health IRB. Detailed country-specific study procedures for the GEAS have been described previously [20].

Shoshanna L. Fine, Rashelle J. Musci, Judith K. Bass, Effie Chipeta, Eric M. Mafuta, Anggriyani W. Pinandari, Siswanto A. Wilopo, Xiayun Zuo, Robert W. Blum,
A Multi-Country Study of Risk and Protective Factors for Emotional and Behavioral Problems Among Early Adolescents, Journal of Adolescent Health,2022,ISSN 1054-139X, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2022.05.002.

 

标签: 伦理
最后更新:2022年6月16日

admin

Research is not to publish, but to find the truth.

点赞
< 上一篇
下一篇 >

文章评论

您需要 登录 之后才可以评论
最新问题
  • 投中elsevier的期刊一分钱都没付 提问人 admin
  • 投稿遇见很难受的事儿:审稿人死扣不放 提问人 admin
  • 何抵制白嫖的一点体会 提问人 admin
  • 论文被一导抢一作 提问人 admin
  • 三个共同通讯,地位怎么排? 提问人 admin
  • 稿件投递后期刊系统生成的PDF文档中图片却发生了旋转90度 提问人 admin
  • 中科院分区弃用影响因子,将替以“期刊超越指数” 提问人 admin
  • 为什么我的论文昨天刚发表学校今天就知道了 提问人 admin
  • 投稿系统只有一个unmarked manuscript选项 提问人 admin
  • 如果sci论文结果自己复现不出来咋办 提问人 admin
最新 热点 随机
最新 热点 随机
We checked the robustness of our findings The aim of this study was twofold. This systematic review and meta-analysis includes previously published observational studies. This indicated there was no requirement for proceeding to a full formal ethics and data protection review by the Usher Research Ethics Group. No overall prospective analysis plan was used. Complete case analyses were used. Study approval was received from Institutional Review Boards (IRBs) of the primary research institution These findings must be interpreted in light of several limitations We excluded those with missing data for the primary exposure The data analysis had been planned in advance of the data gathering Data for the NHIS analyses were weighted using the final person weights Consistent with those of other studies, our findings show that This study is subject to certain limitations. Reductions in indoor tanning could be attributed to several factors. SUDAAN software, version 10.1 (RTI International), which accounts for weighted data and the complex sample design
This systematic review and meta-analysis includes previously published observational studies. Study approval was received from Institutional Review Boards (IRBs) of the primary research institution Gun Carrying As the current study used retrospective publicly available data, we did not require ethics approval. Reductions in indoor tanning could be attributed to several factors. The study was not considered human research We excluded those with missing data for the primary exposure Student consent was assumed with the completion of the questionnaire. The baseline data collection for this study did not require ethical approval. Data for the NHIS analyses were weighted using the final person weights Our study has some limitations. We are aware of only a few previous studies on this topic No overall prospective analysis plan was used. Data analyses were conducted with Stata/SE version 16.0 We checked the robustness of our findings

COPYRIGHT © 2021 nejm.net. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

Theme Kratos Made By Seaton Jiang