论文君|NEJM.net

  • 首页
  • 论文句库
  • 交流中心
  • 我要提问
不出版就出局
Publish or Perish
  1. 首页
  2. 方法
  3. 正文

Gun Carrying

2021年10月23日 1444点热度 0人点赞 1条评论

The YRBS in 1993–2015 was used to assess whether students carried guns by asking “During the past 30 days, on how many days did you carry a gun?” We dichotomized this question to flag those students who carried a gun on at least 1 day during the 30 days before the survey.

In 2017, this question was modified to “During the past 12 months, on how many days did you carry a gun? (Do not count the days when you carried a gun only for hunting or for a sport, such as target shooting).” We used this question to flag the students if they carried a gun for at least 1 day in the past 12 months.

Timsina LR, Qiao N, Mongalo AC, et al. National Instant Criminal Background Check and Youth Gun Carrying. Pediatrics. 2020;145(1):e20191071
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2019-1071

标签: 暂无
最后更新:2021年10月23日

iRobot

有志不在年高,无志空长百岁。

点赞
< 上一篇
下一篇 >

文章评论

  • admin

    Youth gun carrying was defined as a binary variable of having carried a gun on at least 1 day during the 30 days before the survey. The reliability κ for the survey measure (κ = 50.8%), calculated using 1999 data, was classified as between “moderate” and “substantial.”

    State Gun Law Environment and Youth Gun Carrying in the United States
    https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamapediatrics/fullarticle/2443242

    2021年10月23日
    登录以回复
  • 您需要 登录 之后才可以评论
    最新问题
    • sci论文小修编辑没给审稿意见 提问人 admin
    • 为什么编辑部说有些审稿人审完了,但仍未收到comments呢? 提问人 admin
    • sci论文添加作者 提问人 admin
    • 一篇参考文献是特刊上发表的SCI论文,页码怎样标注? 提问人 admin
    • 论文申诉:三个审稿人,两个建议补充,一个建议拒稿 提问人 admin
    • 论文已经available online,后续Track工作的问题 提问人 admin
    • 论文返修中调整作者排序要怎么做呢? 提问人 admin
    • 投中elsevier的期刊一分钱都没付 提问人 admin
    • 投稿遇见很难受的事儿:审稿人死扣不放 提问人 admin
    • 何抵制白嫖的一点体会 提问人 admin
    最新 热点 随机
    最新 热点 随机
    The study used existing publicly available and deidentified data The Stanford institutional review board deemed this study exempt as it uses deidentified, administratively collected data. The HPS contains the Patient Health Questionnaire-4 (PHQ-4), a well-established and validated screening tool for anxiety and depression. HPS public-use files were used to construct the analytic sample. School of Public Health Institutional Review Board deemed this study exempt. Several study limitations should be acknowledged. Ethical approval was not sought as the data were already publicly available online. We checked the robustness of our findings The aim of this study was twofold. This systematic review and meta-analysis includes previously published observational studies. This indicated there was no requirement for proceeding to a full formal ethics and data protection review by the Usher Research Ethics Group. No overall prospective analysis plan was used. Complete case analyses were used. Study approval was received from Institutional Review Boards (IRBs) of the primary research institution These findings must be interpreted in light of several limitations
    These findings must be interpreted in light of several limitations Gun Carrying School of Public Health Institutional Review Board deemed this study exempt. This study followed the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) reporting guideline for cross-sectional studies. The data analysis had been planned in advance of the data gathering The IRB at the University of Massachusetts Medical School reviewed the protocol and exempted it from the full committee review This indicated there was no requirement for proceeding to a full formal ethics and data protection review by the Usher Research Ethics Group. We checked the robustness of our findings This study is not without limitations. We excluded those with missing data for the primary exposure The Stanford institutional review board deemed this study exempt as it uses deidentified, administratively collected data. Study approval was received from Institutional Review Boards (IRBs) of the primary research institution Student consent was assumed with the completion of the questionnaire. Several study limitations should be acknowledged. HPS public-use files were used to construct the analytic sample.

    COPYRIGHT © 2021 nejm.net. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

    Theme Kratos Made By Seaton Jiang