论文君|NEJM.net

  • 首页
  • 论文句库
  • 交流中心
  • 我要提问
不出版就出局
Publish or Perish
  1. 首页
  2. 方法
  3. 正文

Gun Carrying

2021年10月23日 810点热度 0人点赞 1条评论

The YRBS in 1993–2015 was used to assess whether students carried guns by asking “During the past 30 days, on how many days did you carry a gun?” We dichotomized this question to flag those students who carried a gun on at least 1 day during the 30 days before the survey.

In 2017, this question was modified to “During the past 12 months, on how many days did you carry a gun? (Do not count the days when you carried a gun only for hunting or for a sport, such as target shooting).” We used this question to flag the students if they carried a gun for at least 1 day in the past 12 months.

Timsina LR, Qiao N, Mongalo AC, et al. National Instant Criminal Background Check and Youth Gun Carrying. Pediatrics. 2020;145(1):e20191071
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2019-1071

标签: 暂无
最后更新:2021年10月23日

iRobot

有志不在年高,无志空长百岁。

点赞
< 上一篇
下一篇 >

文章评论

  • admin

    Youth gun carrying was defined as a binary variable of having carried a gun on at least 1 day during the 30 days before the survey. The reliability κ for the survey measure (κ = 50.8%), calculated using 1999 data, was classified as between “moderate” and “substantial.”

    State Gun Law Environment and Youth Gun Carrying in the United States
    https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamapediatrics/fullarticle/2443242

    2021年10月23日
    登录以回复
  • 您需要 登录 之后才可以评论
    最新问题
    • 投中elsevier的期刊一分钱都没付 提问人 admin
    • 投稿遇见很难受的事儿:审稿人死扣不放 提问人 admin
    • 何抵制白嫖的一点体会 提问人 admin
    • 论文被一导抢一作 提问人 admin
    • 三个共同通讯,地位怎么排? 提问人 admin
    • 稿件投递后期刊系统生成的PDF文档中图片却发生了旋转90度 提问人 admin
    • 中科院分区弃用影响因子,将替以“期刊超越指数” 提问人 admin
    • 为什么我的论文昨天刚发表学校今天就知道了 提问人 admin
    • 投稿系统只有一个unmarked manuscript选项 提问人 admin
    • 如果sci论文结果自己复现不出来咋办 提问人 admin
    最新 热点 随机
    最新 热点 随机
    We checked the robustness of our findings The aim of this study was twofold. This systematic review and meta-analysis includes previously published observational studies. This indicated there was no requirement for proceeding to a full formal ethics and data protection review by the Usher Research Ethics Group. No overall prospective analysis plan was used. Complete case analyses were used. Study approval was received from Institutional Review Boards (IRBs) of the primary research institution These findings must be interpreted in light of several limitations We excluded those with missing data for the primary exposure The data analysis had been planned in advance of the data gathering Data for the NHIS analyses were weighted using the final person weights Consistent with those of other studies, our findings show that This study is subject to certain limitations. Reductions in indoor tanning could be attributed to several factors. SUDAAN software, version 10.1 (RTI International), which accounts for weighted data and the complex sample design
    This study followed the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) reporting guideline for cross-sectional studies. Complete case analyses were used. No overall prospective analysis plan was used. We checked the robustness of our findings SUDAAN software, version 10.1 (RTI International), which accounts for weighted data and the complex sample design The aim of this study was twofold. Consistent with those of other studies, our findings show that This systematic review and meta-analysis includes previously published observational studies. These new findings should be examined alongside several study limitations. Ethical approval was granted from the Ethics Committee of Stockholm. All GSHS surveys were approved in each country by both a national government administrative body and an institutional review board or ethics committee Reductions in indoor tanning could be attributed to several factors. This indicated there was no requirement for proceeding to a full formal ethics and data protection review by the Usher Research Ethics Group. Data analyses were conducted with Stata/SE version 16.0 As the current study used retrospective publicly available data, we did not require ethics approval.

    COPYRIGHT © 2021 nejm.net. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

    Theme Kratos Made By Seaton Jiang