论文君|NEJM.net

  • 首页
  • 论文句库
  • 交流中心
  • 我要提问
不出版就出局
Publish or Perish
  1. 首页
  2. 方法
  3. 正文

The study was not considered human research

2020年8月22日 1691点热度 0人点赞 2条评论

The study was not considered human research according to the review policy of the Research Institute at Nationwide Children’s Hospital institutional review board because all data were deidentified and publicly available.

出处:Trends in Suicide Among Youth Aged 10 to 19 Years in the United States, 1975 to 2016
JAMA Netw Open. 2019;2(5):e193886. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.3886

标签: 伦理
最后更新:2020年8月22日

iRobot

有志不在年高,无志空长百岁。

点赞
下一篇 >

文章评论

  • admin

    1If your research involves the use of existing data collected from human participants (e.g., secondary datasets, existing biological samples), but there are no identifiers linking human participants to the data/samples themselves, then the activity may not require IRB review and may be considered "not human participant research".

    https://www.irb.cornell.edu/faq

    2020年8月22日
    登录以回复
  • admin

    Additionally, use of existing de-identified or publicly available datasets may not
    be considered human subject research. For more information, see the following document: Secondary Analysis of Public Use Datasets.
    https://irb.utah.edu/_pdf/IGS%20-%20Secondary%20Analysis%20of%20Public%20Use%20Datasets%20B2819.pdf

    2020年8月22日
    登录以回复
  • 您需要 登录 之后才可以评论
    最新问题
    • sci论文小修编辑没给审稿意见 提问人 admin
    • 为什么编辑部说有些审稿人审完了,但仍未收到comments呢? 提问人 admin
    • sci论文添加作者 提问人 admin
    • 一篇参考文献是特刊上发表的SCI论文,页码怎样标注? 提问人 admin
    • 论文申诉:三个审稿人,两个建议补充,一个建议拒稿 提问人 admin
    • 论文已经available online,后续Track工作的问题 提问人 admin
    • 论文返修中调整作者排序要怎么做呢? 提问人 admin
    • 投中elsevier的期刊一分钱都没付 提问人 admin
    • 投稿遇见很难受的事儿:审稿人死扣不放 提问人 admin
    • 何抵制白嫖的一点体会 提问人 admin
    最新 热点 随机
    最新 热点 随机
    The study used existing publicly available and deidentified data The Stanford institutional review board deemed this study exempt as it uses deidentified, administratively collected data. The HPS contains the Patient Health Questionnaire-4 (PHQ-4), a well-established and validated screening tool for anxiety and depression. HPS public-use files were used to construct the analytic sample. School of Public Health Institutional Review Board deemed this study exempt. Several study limitations should be acknowledged. Ethical approval was not sought as the data were already publicly available online. We checked the robustness of our findings The aim of this study was twofold. This systematic review and meta-analysis includes previously published observational studies. This indicated there was no requirement for proceeding to a full formal ethics and data protection review by the Usher Research Ethics Group. No overall prospective analysis plan was used. Complete case analyses were used. Study approval was received from Institutional Review Boards (IRBs) of the primary research institution These findings must be interpreted in light of several limitations
    These findings must be interpreted in light of several limitations These new findings should be examined alongside several study limitations. This study followed the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) reporting guideline for cross-sectional studies. The IRB at the University of Massachusetts Medical School reviewed the protocol and exempted it from the full committee review Addressing school violence and bullying is essential in order to achieve the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) This systematic review and meta-analysis includes previously published observational studies. approval from an Institutional Review Board was not necessary Data for the NHIS analyses were weighted using the final person weights Complete case analyses were used. As the current study used retrospective publicly available data, we did not require ethics approval. Gun Carrying The data analysis had been planned in advance of the data gathering Our study has some limitations. We excluded those with missing data for the primary exposure This study is subject to certain limitations.

    COPYRIGHT © 2021 nejm.net. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

    Theme Kratos Made By Seaton Jiang